URL Scanning vs. URL Analysis and Enrichment
What's the difference and why it matters
Most security teams, security vendors, MSSPs, and ISPs seek to know if URLs in their emails, network, or endpoint traffic are malicious. In many cases, they use URL scanning services, which typically involve a look-up against a curated database of known threats. Security analysts and threats researchers performing phishing incident response and threat hunting may also utilize URL enrichment services, either manually or through automated playbooks.
URL Analysis and Enrichment provides a single, correlated source of intelligence for a complete view. This whitepaper will deep-dive into these differences and more.
Download for a Deep Dive into the Difference Between URL Scanning vs Analysis and Enrichment
Exceptional Power, Extreme Accuracy
SEER™ stands for Session Emulation and Environment Reconnaissance. It’s a new and more effective approach for detecting phishing threats that evade anti-phishing methods that rely on URL inspection and domain reputation analysis. SEER uses virtual browsers to dynamically inspect page contents and server behavior in a purpose-built cloud to definitively detect phishing sites in real-time and with extreme accuracy.
Related SlashNext Resources
SlashNext Mobile and Browser Phishing Protection vs. the Competition
SlashNext Mobile Phishing Protection With increased mobile device usage for both business and per…
Cortex XSOAR and SlashNext Solutions Brief
Cortex XSOAR and SlashNext URL Analysis and Enrichment Joint Solutions Brief for Phishing IR and …
SlashNext and Cortex XSOAR Webinar: Automate Phishing Detection and Remediation for O365
Join Cortex and SlashNext for a webinar on automating phishing on-demand URL analysis as part of …
ThreatConnect and SlashNext : Automating Abuse Inbox Management as Part of Phishing IR
On-Demand Webinar With ThreatConnect’s automation features and definitive phishing URL analysis f…
